Mitsubishi servomotors are 40% more compact than others. This adds up positively to the overall size of the machine, and takes up less space in the shop. You can take more powerful servomotors and cram them into a smaller
machine.
Durable. According to statistics (failures of servomotors), it is on Mitsubishi didn't fail a single motor, not one servo amplifier.
Yes, there are problems with cables, but it does not apply to the motors themselves. It's a connection problem.
Mitsubishi motors have stable torque ratings. They always deliver what they're given.
Software: flexibly adjustable. They adjust to any mechanics, these motors have a mode for damping resonant vibrations and frequencies. Each
metal support has a resonant frequency.
Example:
when a company of soldiers walks in step on a bridge, for example, the bridge begins to vibrate and sway. Now, Mitsubishi has a built-in feature that detects these resonant frequencies and automatically dampens them.So when you're working on long outreaches, say on the Z axis or something, you'll get better results on the Mitsubishi than on other servomotors. Of course they are used on others as well, but with the Mitsubishi it's already proven.
The Mitsubishi motors have no restrictions on use. That is, if any type of accuracy characteristics do not hold up, you can change the stiffness characteristics of the motor in place.
They give a fairly large margin for holding-in-place reaction speed, depending on the stiffness of the structure to which they are attached. Accordingly, we can adjust so that on a stiffer structure we will put more positioning accuracy, and on a less rigid structure we will put less accuracy. The motor will decelerate, accelerate, and return to the point more smoothly.
With such servomotors, we can achieve more acceleration than with boards
