Supporters say it is a measure against censorship. But slotxo critics are concerned about disinformation and malicious content.Florida could soon become the first US state to ban social media companies such as Facebook and Twitter from kicking politicians from their sites following President Donald Trump's high-profile ban earlier this year. Trump The bill passed by Florida's Republicans-led House and Senate this week and headed to the governor's office said the social site could not. Political candidates can "dismiss the platform", meaning they cannot deliver packages permanently or temporarily ban them for more than 14 days.Sites that violate the law may be fined $ 250,000 per day for the dismissal of applicants from across the state and $ 25,000 per day for banning applicants from working in other offices.
Supporters of the SB 7072 bill said it would prevent social media companies from censoring views it disagreed with, but critics said the law would prevent companies from cracking down on disinformation and malicious content.Florida Gov. Ronde Santis, a coalition of Republicans and Trump, called for the bill and is expected to sign the reported on Friday. But added that the law could be challenged in court.Facebook, Twitter and other social media companies have repeatedly denied claims about the rights they censor content for ideological reasons.Twitter permanently banned Trump on Jan. 8 "due to the risk of provoking violence" following a deadly riot at Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C. Facebook blocked. Trump was "indefinite" on the same day. The move follows a series of instances where Twitter overshadowed Trump's controversial tweets with warning badges containing links to more information and letting users click to read the tweet.
Facebook generally takes a more hands-free approach. But added a label to Trump's unfounded claims about election corruption.Representatives of a Republican supporter of a Florida bill told the Tampa Bay Times that companies such as Facebook and Twitter have too much power to control speech.A representative for Blaise Ingoglia told the publication, "Social media companies and their enormity are becoming a real problem and becoming a first-resolution problem.But executives at NetChoice, a self-described technology lobby company, work. "To make the Internet safer for free organizations and free expression," the Times said, Florida's law is not unconstitutional.The bill rejects conservative values, violates the First Amendment and will force websites to host anti-Semitic, racist and hateful content,
NetChoice vice president and general counsel Carl Szabo told the newspaper.The Washington Post reported in January that a week after Twitter banned Trump and other sites banning various pro-Trump content, misinformation online about election fraud dropped 73 percent. Information told the post.The bottom line is that downsizing the platform, especially at the scale that happened last week, reduces the momentum and the ability to quickly reach new audiences," said Graham Brookie, director of the digital forensic research laboratory at Follow-up disinformation, the Atlantic Council said to the Post at the time. But downsizing the platform "There is also a tendency to strengthen the views of those who are involved in the spread of that type of false information
